![]() Fall 1999 | Table of Contents | Library Index | CC Home |
![]() Force and Acceleration by Robert Tinker and Carolyn Staudt
The ImagiWorks software is remarkably sophisticated, growing out of research The Concord Consortium did with Elliot Soloway and ImagiWorks founder Wayne Grant. Groups of datasets are stored with calibration data, notes, and sketches in file structures called experiments. This makes the software a complete record-keeping package that is ideal for fieldwork. The software also communicates with PCs for later analysis. Measuring force and acceleration at the same time isn't as easy as it sounds because we had to measure all the forces on the object being accelerated. At first we tried pushing a person across the floor in a wheeled chair, but the force of friction was hard to measure. We had to find a situation with less friction.
One problem to take into consideration is the force of the support rope. The only time that it doesn't exert a horizontal force is when the swing is at its lowest position. To get the best data, we started pushing the empty swing just before it reached its lowest point, and continued pushing until it reached the same distance on the other side of the lowest point. Figure 3 shows some data from our experiment extracted from a spreadsheet program. You can see at a glance that the upper force curve and the lower acceleration curve are similar. In fact, they are proportional, with the force being between seven and nine times the acceleration. There is some error in the measurement because of the force applied by the support rope that we didn't measure. Still, these data are convincing direct evidence that force causes acceleration and that the ratio between them is the mass. To test this further, we put a child on the swing (see Figure 2). Now, a much greater force should be needed for the same acceleration. The ratio of force to acceleration should be larger, reflecting the added mass of the person. And, in fact, the acceleration was so small that we couldn't put it on the same graph (see Figure 4) with the force without multiplying the acceleration by a factor of 170 (compared to the factor of seven to nine that worked for the empty swing). As you can see, the two lines of the graph don't quite line up. In fact, the acceleration seems to be ahead of the force and the visible bumps between the two lines on the graph appear to be delayed. Possible reasons might include that the child anticipated the push and that he shifted his weight as the swing moved forward. The two lines are about the same height, showing that more force is needed for the same acceleration when the mass increases. These two experiments make it clear that: We are not the only ones fascinated by the acceleration sensor. At the grand finale of a recent keynote address, Steve Jobs had a colleague jump 20 feet into an air bag clutching their new portable iBook attached to an accelerometer. They used the wireless networking capacity of the iBook to successfully send the data in real time to a stationary iBook. We don't recommend this for students, however! We hope readers will continue experimenting on their own. Can you get better force and acceleration data on a swing or another device? Be sure to visit our Probe Sight web page for more information on probes and how they can be used.
|
|
Fall 1999 | Table of Contents | Library Index | CC Home
Copyright © 1999 The Concord Consortium, All rights reserved. Last updated: 9-Oct-99 |




That's what led us to a playground swing, which is a very low friction device. We velcroed the acceleration probe to the seat of a "rocking horse" 
